{"156":{"first":"Matthew ","last":"Whitaker"},"170":"Westlaw Court Express","158":{"street":"1333 H Street NW","street2":" Suite 700E","city":"Washington ","state":"DC","zip":"20005","country":"United States"},"159":"matthew.whitaker@thomsonreuters.com","160":"","161":"Call number KFD152.U55 1967 Section 404 of article 8","164":"val1","162":"I'm looking for the Delaware study comments to this section, especially those prepared during the legislative process that go along with 8-404\r\n\r\n\u201cThe Delaware Study Comment to s 404(2) specifically confirms this in its reference to an election of remedies: \u2018The text of s 8-404(2) expressly recognizes the right of the registered owner of the security to obtain a new security from the issuer in those situations enumerated in s 8-404(2) (a), (b), & (c). The draftmen's official comments to this section note that the case law has also recognized the right to elect between an equitable action to compel issue of a new security and an action for damages.\u201d\r\nSource: Scott v. Ametek, Inc., 277 A.2d 714 (1971)\r\n"}